Blog

  • Information And Misconceptions

    We live in a society that has developed many layers of information, particularly when it comes to communication systems to inform across on the perceived realities of situations.

    On the focused point here, is the factor of who is where, what, etc.

    We call it news, podcasts, blogs, magazines, and small posts across social media these days.

    For those more familiar with the topic for whichever reason, its evolution is also significant, and the differences of how it has happened and how it is both developed and delivered also quite significantly different through time.

    The ignorance ergo thrown around as I both covered in “Blog”, and easily observable across of delusions in letters, symbols and meanings trastorned, including in more advanced systems such as espionage, and assumptions of just about anything, including slave like takes of “collaborations” over people, etc, along more “bold” statements and “open” actions as observed in 2016 and later of public statements by speakers and media managers for example those of presidential status with statements like: “fake news”, and “alternative facts”, not only adds to the sensitivity of understanding the facts over sensationalism – both positive and negative, but the evolution of communications, and the needing to account a level of intellectual and less emotional take over the information presented, which is often designed with a common goal/ purpose of those behind it, that might at first glance not be evidential to most.

    Not to be confused with approving the ignorant because it is tactless and bears grotesque takes of detrimental corruption of the reality over the presented, but to detach the reactionary over the taking action, and the ability to think coherently.

    Sensationalism feeds the emotional, and hopes to motivate and control the reactionary to an specific goal ideally, if not to the least a general one.

    Like less than pleasant situations in life and the shock value of finding out the morbid reality of whichever the page has been suddenly destroyed in the history of whosever’s storyline.

    In the ethos of developing an image be for an individual and or group/ company, etc, the idealism rests on it been a positive one, even when the reality is an actual alternative fact.

    In a curated media and or controlled environment such actions become much more the norm, and ironically in the reality of intellect and actual value versus the illusion of, accounting emotional intellect or not, still detrimental in the actual picture of long term reality, in itself showing the uselessness of it overall, and the methods and tactics of such only being useful and in that sense temporarily and limited, to those who lack the comprehension of self and or large advancement.

    For all great things to become mastered to their full potential there is only one masterful path, the rest is a trial and error, and the attempts to walk either in deviance of for the favoring by/ of small sight, or to avoid the already wrong favored, hopefully, anyway.

    You hear/ read the word “Balance”, and in your own understanding, bring it to its fit into the equation of whichever scenario and the “what it takes”, at the same time in personal, business, the small and or the big of society and civilization, it is observable that whether in true ethics applied or in corruption, the meaning does not always provide the greatest of outcomes, and can fall into “wishful thinking”, for better and or for worse.

    Detachment of ideologies and emotional reactions plays a significant role onto the often seen as “balance” take onto whichever situation and its assessment. That is both of the positive altruistic connotations and those of selfish greed basis.

    There’s a reason that certain views that have affected society and civilization negatively have failed, “luckily”, and that what is often around still remains a fight between too idealistic takes on both ends versus actual advancement to full its potential.


    To add to the thematic of specifics in present day world and what has already been covered for years on my site here, in the specifics of “Blog” as well, I already spoke of leadership, and specified in the political arena, and the qualities of those who postulate themselves, and even dived deeper into present day examples and the contrasts beyond labels.

    As already I’ve stated and easily proven too year after year, I do not have any particular leniency towards particular/ specific groups, including those of pro and or anti politics anything, anywhere.

    Likewise that it does not amount to carelessness, and or openness to anything, anyone,anywhere, rather of logical reasoning, and even in the obvious by choices presented, the detachment of absolutisms. Again, the later not been an open invitation to ignore the wrong and negative, but rather not become idealistic by the overly seemingly positive.

    Anything in the foundations of detrimental was that, is that, and changing its presentation after found out especially, doesn’t change the foundations; convenience is that, and when seeking mastery and advancement, useless. Example, an used and tried method to do things cannot become better/ updated unless it is separated of the “convenience” of how it has been done, and so on.

    In the topic at hand of this article, the methods of communicating / informing the understanding and knowledge of situations and individuals, matters a lot in the overall of the “collectives” that are society and civilization.

    A media empire is often sought out by those who benefit from such; in the other scenario is those who wish to have knowledge of an specific something shared onto the world.

    Social media being the pebble onto the pool of tradition, now with algorithmic curation, becoming detrimental to, ironically too, to the empire of its value to its owners and investors, at the advice of those who depended more on the “traditional”/ conventional/ “convenient” customary methods. Talk about balance, regardless of values and ethics.

    It’s not to say that disparity is favored because. It was that same tool of “freedom” that was used to later on lessen the value of the environment (social media’s), and favor ergo the implementation of such systems as “algorithms”, which then damaged the benefits for both, users and those profiting from the intangible technology. “The long term game” of damage is an often reliable tool of those who like things as they are because it benefits them in their limited views, versus that of the larger and longer term picture, including life beyond theirs.


    Going a little bit deeper into specifics of current day, and the “what’s been in the news”, there are controversies of individuals who have influence, in the sense of the topics at hand, and important matters that keep surfacing over multiple years because of the severity of complications, and going adjacent to politics of course, there is that of the very affluent financially speaking of our present day.

    There’s also significant news such as those of Jeffrey Epstein, a known abuser and violator of the law, besides that of running human trafficking networks and other harmful operatives, often catering to the very influential and “elite” groups of society today.

    In the thematics of media and communications, you can easily observe the implications of then the connections, and even in less first thought obvious, the running of such operatives and practices then connected with the power of data collection, and political and social influence. Dangerous, detrimental, destructive are not even enough to truly amount to the math of what it all encompasses.

    A good dive onto “Blog” here, and overall “AdonaiOrion” detached of distractions and applying the “golden rules” as I’ve stated myself many times over the years, including of those deflecting into trying to use gender, faith, race, religion, age, income, socio status, political groups, geolocation, etc, because of the caliber of information and detail that goes beyond opinion but backed by irrefutable unbiased facts, is a perfect example of what is the situation of such as mentioned on this article, including what measures are applied by those who wish to suppress the facts and like to advance detrimental fallacies, all proven and posted with evidence scenarios as well.

    Returning to the specifics of this article, then we can easily observe, even if yet to dive onto “Blog” content, the power of information, and also the dangers of those controlling/ producing it.

    In the examples listed above we have the value of knowing then about certain practices, and the distortion of its presentation to lessen its value, and try to maintain and even advance systems of abuse.

    In the sense of “economical influence”, and the obvious vs. the convenience and common practices of relating around it, it all too matters.

    For example before buying out “Twitter”, and even unsuccessfully attempting to rebrand it as “X”, in the ignorant hopes that in time its origins could too be vanished, like that of the origins of other now bankrupt and forgotten or “stolen” conceptualizations by the same, Elon Musk tried to buyout companies like “Facebook” also known as “Meta”, and “The Onion” another media outlet with substantial stake in the print and digital news arena.

    There are likely others, however as with all of Mr. Musk’s ventures, deception is a key aspect on knowing the true facts surrounding him and his affiliates.

    Some key attributes that are useful on the comparison of curated information and being able to tell the facts. Mr. Musk is a great example of deception, attempting to develop further such, and the importance of making a stance against it, beyond opinion, with verified, unbiased facts.

    Unknown to a lot of people are facts like Mr. Musk’s curated image of genius and contributor to society and civilization, far from the actual in application reality of such. Some of many examples include the lies behind companies like Tesla, not just what it unfortunately has become under his ownership as main stakeholder, but also the actual origins of both its development/ conceptualization, and its foundations onto an actual applicable idea of developed technology in business, all news you don’t find on the companies website or history, and due to Mr. Musk’s financial benefactors from misconceptions, and misapplications in technologies and their investments in media outlets, on the overall of news publications. Rarely do you get an actual glimpse of the actual reality of who Elon Musk is as a person, as a business owner, and overall of his businesses’ practices as well.

    You don’t have to take my word for it, ironically in the “boredom” of being a fictitious genius comes the attention seeking, and in the indepth of mentally inadequate, be for whichever reasons which could easily include the fact of severe narcotic and drug abuse, beyond the “light marijuana” user display attempted presented in 2018 on the podcast of Mr. Joe Rogan, an attempt to dilute and try to dismiss public evidence of worse yet, such as his on off sexual partners and mothers of some of his children Amber Heard and Claire Boucher also known as Grimes whom are also heavy narcotic users and verified abusers of other men and women including physical and sexual acts, and the implications across besides other, including lawsuits like the Jonny Depp divorce, and the “4, 20 funding secure” stock announcement by Mr. Musk in 2018, an illegal action, even if it was “secured”, as it is literally the definition of “insider information”; you can add, not all investors read Twitter, and it was purposely done with the intention to manipulate short and long investments.

    There are several other open direct admittances by Mr. Musk and his partners both sexual and financial of illegal and illicit wrong doing, not in some casual candid manner of feeling like themselves, but rather of calculative, manipulative and even arrogant self views such as those of insulting others in indirect references, and even more direct. Some examples of several include statements backed by actions such as Mr. Musk’s “We can coup whoever we want”, and even worse, Ms. Amber Heard’s fake “me too”, and “leaked” videos all set by her, Ms. Boucher’s arrogant statements of abuse like that of her partner’s, lies of visual surgery, activities, artistic intellectual property theft, doxxing, hacking open admittances in mockery and hidden threats multiple times since 2018, and more.

    There are even legal dockets of testimonies admitting to using pseudonyms across by all mentioned individuals and others in their circle, to stalk, doxx, intimidate, harass, steal knowledge, data, worse. Not to mention fake B.O.L.O. reports, in retaliation attempts to paint people they’ve targeted because of many reasons, including for exposing to media and or filing legally with evidence for carrying illicit activities; also the usage of “live watching devices” software like that of “pegasus spyware” deployed in such activities, without the awareness of those affected and against their will too of course, as it is always the scenario. 

    In the contrast of such actions, Mr. Musk’s involvement in coups adds to aspects that are further understood next to the USA’s political turmoil situation of 8+ years, and simultaneously that of having a network of incentivized individuals across to continue to manipulate in such manners, which are not limited to political influence, but also of situations like those of voyeurism incentives, known and verified with legal dockets relationships with convicted criminals like Jeffrey Epstein and Andrew Tate (human trafficking operatives verified on both, internationally, including children), both relationships often downplayed on the media, when the matter of the fact is the evidence is not only substantial, but also verified legally as part of legal dockets in proceedings like that of the early Ghislaine Maxwell trials (Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal trial began with opening statements on November 29, 2021. The court proceedings, including depositions and the trial itself, were not televised or live-streamed online; a video feed was available only in an adjacent overflow room at the courthouse), criminal activities such as one of several examples also include insurrection of the Capitol Hill in the United States senate January 2021, and the same in Canada with the “Trucker’s Convoy” January 2022, besides several other like the open admittance just prior to these, of Bolivia’s similar coup insurrection in 2019, and other.

    These and more can not only be found on my section of “Blog”, but also across sites like “https://www.plainsite.org“, a site whose owner like myself, has also encountered horrible actions done upon personal real life and digital, enacted by Mr. Musk, partners, and incentivized networks in retaliation for sharing facts of legal implications, including dockets, even though we both are abiding by integrity of the law and human rights information acts; I couldn’t say much beyond what I know about Mr. Greenspan and what I know about the situations mentioned, in my personal case there’s the significance of intellectual property theft and immediate targeting, including of personal life to try and diminish my artistic and even personal life growth, by Mr. Musk and his partners including political internationally on both personal and business, of course, don’t forget ALL done BEFORE I actually started writing in specifics of these for multiple years, and while I was a paying customer of Mr. Musk’s and his affiliates’ companies, all in the name of stealing intellectual property for self gain by ALL involved, this including sexual harassment digitally and in real life. As undeserved and abusive as it gets, verified.

    In the sense of processing data, news, and being unbiased, irrefutable evidence matters for that matter; it helps to go even beyond the limits of laws, opinions, and even personal views and societal standards.

    In the examples at hand, it is why such people have relied on bullying, harassing, denying, deflecting, and creating feigned situations of versus to benefit themselves in targiversing the facts, and distract, contradict and so on, all in the purpose of avoiding the actual truth.

    You’ve seen it with Elon Musk and several individuals, including politically, some predominant examples besides his sexual partners and UCLA millions to try and clean the image of a domestic and sexual abuser such as is Amber Heard, to also incorporate further influence in UCLA/ UN by coup groups, and fake broken mother and breakups of Claire Boucher/ Grimes, who often is behind signaling crypto stock manipulations and criminal activities by incentivized networks with “alternative facts”, which include live watching devices, doxxing, coercing – her own admittance in mockery, “misinformation”, and “sensationalism – fake news”, there are Donald Trump since 2016 and “quitting”, while also constantly benefiting personally, politically, incentivized in companies, and sitting in advisory, other roles in both rounds of Mr. Trump politics. You can add among many internationally also Mr. Doug Ford and circle, cancelling July 2025 one of multiple contracts with Mr. Musk’s companies, due to the overwhelming evidence I’ve presented over the years, which includes the cancelling being only done to try and salvage image, and prop the tariff wars that began in 2018, same year of Mr. Doug Ford’s questionable election and open statements of intent to damage the “green belt”, Mr. Doug Ford being completely unaware there was a media microphone on recording where he felt comfortable to state such, all that next to Mr. Musk’s and sexual partners aforementioned’s “April fools” and “bankwopt” cryptic tweets; coups and serving as “clean up image agents” really shows an undeniable picture, adding a year old (November 2024) statement by Mr. Doug Ford on his mockery of abuses, and happy contracts with Musk on several other occasions, adds to the point.

    Dilutions, and deflections go hand in hand.

    “Death By Water” August 2018 (right around my 33rd birthday same month and year), the involvement in data theft, my personal story, the false affiliations in indirect language by individuals in companies like Suki Waterhouse, Robert Iger CEO of Disney, etc, besides Musk’s sexual partners which include Grimes signed in 2021 to Columbia Records after all facts exposed, as a mock on a survivor of rape and Colombian born person, myself, and several other details shown under “Blog”, adds to the perspective, and these people’s mocks of dilutions and deflections, including late 2022 claims of Warner of “Scorched Earth Letters”, due to again, the caliber of evidence I had been building on since I started talking about these things end of 2019 – with side by side plagiarism evidence January 2020. Trying to loop Qanon/ MAGA, Convoy, etc., into my evidence, not only hoping to make me sound deluded, but also as coverups of these people, and try to gain validation of abuses in support due to obvious evidence, while trying to continue to assassinate my character, and build their across deceptive images, adds to the perspective. You’ll notice the on and off playing vs. and enemies of all mentioned and more, a significant useful tactic also part of dilute, distract, deflect; “DEATH BY WATER”.


    You’ve heard of many people either involved in business or having had an invitation to a party/ meeting where Mr. Jeffrey Epstein was involved. Does that mean based off of their social, personal, economic status, other traits they are like others here in my example mentioned? I think that where sensationalism is separated from shock value due to being out of the norm, and facts presented outside emotional states, even other perhaps seen as “issues”, and intellect dominates the commonality of ignorance, it then becomes more obvious to make a difference, if to the least, not dilute, but focus on what brings attention where it matters most.

    There are many examples of course, including of females because of their modeling careers, and people in business.

    One example that goes hand in hand well with the article here and the topic, is that of Mr. Jeff Bezos.

    I’ve written about Mr. Bezos before, and it included lightly on my perceptions of grouping everyone who was involved with Mr. Jeffrey Epstein to literally try and save the image of those who are actually guilty.

    Like myself being a paying customer of these companies, and long ago in awareness assume the media coverage of such was based off of integrity, it happens often in the real world we meet, connect, and do things personally and or professionally at the best of our knowledge and understanding. It is when all factors are said and done, where the true perspective of things is best observed, hence the examples I’ve presented; even in my own personal experiences with aforementioned, I never jumped to conclusions, and even when knowing, I focused on gathering the facts, as I understand well that unbiased and irrefutable are the strongest of points in any situation, big or small, personal or not.

    Can’t claim to be victim of someone you are doxing, harassing, falsifying claims over their lives to themselves, when they know what’s private, what’s not, what is true, what is not; proving it publicly then comes with the irrefutable evidence, period. Anything else is noise to distract, deflect, gaslight and hope to then dismiss. Remember or forget, doesn’t change what it is, as much as assuming how the mind of anyone works based off of oneself or another’s, of course.

    In the story of Mr. Bezos and in one of few articles attempted to blanket all who ever were seen near Mr. Epstein, there is a lot to account. If I am not mistaken, it was one occasion where there was an event organized and everyone including Mr. Bezos and even Mr. Epstein were guests, even though the organizers were later on found to have deeper ties with Mr. Epstein, it doesn’t suddenly means that all who attended were implicit, unless you were talking about a different type of event/ meeting which wasn’t the case at all on this instance.

    In my basic opinion, based out of what is public knowledge, Mr. Bezos does not come off on my radar as a frequent partner/ friend/ customer/ affiliated to Mr. Epstein; the data, regardless of the sensationalism does not apply, simple.

    Likewise to compare Mr. Bezos with Mr. Musk, adds to my observation. The references by Mr. Musk of creating sensationalism to both signal his cult/ affiliates, distract from his own shortcomings is regular practice by him, and became a heavy thing after my peace message in January 2018 stopping the gaslighting attempts by Mr. Trump and affiliates to try and throw the world into Nuclear World War III.

    Mr. Musk’s March 3rd (my son’s birthday being one day prior) 2018 “Alexa laughs an Angel dies” tweet, a reference to a hacking glitch on Amazon’s Alexa AI products, really adds to the indirect language, timeline, etc, and curated images next to hidden threats, deflections, false affiliations, false heroes, false friends, even faked versus/ breakups, as you see my legal name being: “Angel”, and all other aspects, including artistic dilution, “death by water”, and those involved, really adds to the perspective of it all.

    Another example same timeline includes Mr. Musk’s cult, for which he himself has openly embraced, including many tweets thanking them for harassment and “alternative facts”, including on media, even quoting their actions, including criminal acts, also wishing them happy holidays in many occasions, show the already proven with a lengthy list of evidence, including the minds and personalities behind, being of an abusive and criminal nature, matching that of their openly “admired”; the spreading of a false meeting interaction of Mr. Musk with Mr. Zuckerberg and what ideas they had of having fun, show everything aforementioned and more, including setting up scenarios of images on people to benefit themselves across, pretences, and so on.

    I’ve had several issues with Meta, and the fallacies of short vs. long stock bets, british jokes and the claims of vs., like those of breakups, etc, adds to the perspective of the sources. It is of course far from “water under the bridge”, and definitely not a “forgive and forget”, nonetheless in the case of points that matter and unbiased, it shows exactly that.

    On the story of Mr. Bezos, it is also no obscurity or conspiracy Mr. Musk is a petulant and flat out to the point on my statement here, envious character.

    I do not know Mr. Bezos, but his actual successes are easily observable, as much as anyone might want to nitpick criticisms of certain things, which then are applied across the infrastructure of businesses in like sectors; it reminds me of the environmentalists that attack oil rigs, but ignore lithium acid pools and cobalt mining ethics that are far more damaging in their lesser time of existence in smaller scale too, and those against places like “Marine Land”, but not feeling the same against overfishing, ocean pollution, places like Marine Land that operate, private aquarium owners, business practices, etc. It all matters as a whole issue, or it doesn’t. Tampering with businesses only aggravates problems, and silences reason towards the actual issues, I might add. Useless to benefit the affected, or to inform the uninformed or misinformed too.

    Mr. Musk’s incapability to accomplish what others have, and try to diminish their image, growth, recognition, likewise isn’t only limited to my story, but that of many others, including the original creators and founders of Tesla Motors: Mr. Martin Eberhard, and Mr. Marc Tarpenning. Likewise Mr. Musk’s affinity to circle towards like minded individuals as it is beyond easily observable in all his sexual partners, business partners and incentivized network, without the hint of a doubt.

    Gathering data operatives, media control, then starts to show an even greater picture of harm when presented with actual examples of irrefutable evidence.

    It is so powerful to be informed, of the actual truth, rather than be inflamed with the lies of ignorance.

    It is why understanding the complexity of such and how to get around it, as my examples here have presented, matters.

    Going beyond being emotional and or reactive, to thinking, it’s the fundamental of understanding, and actual useful information over the noise and distractions of the world.

    Although not always easily discernable, as anyone can see, without needing to hack, doxx, ignore, coerce, the truth is always in plain sight, even among the biggest of lies.//

    โˆ…ADONAIโˆ…โ˜€๏ธ

    11.12.2025 09:15

  • Diplomacy In Leadership & Deflections

    When it comes to society and civilization, it is a collective of what ultimately adds to progress, over the pervasive, perverse and detrimental.

    Leadership is critical to advancement, in all aspects; perturbed assumptions and fallacies are damaging, of course.

    Attributes of growth go beyond standards of bamboozledment displays, and deflections of facts, too.

    Corruption, evil, go hand on hand with these often, for a reason.

    Placing oneself in harmful takes in any position of being a part of society and civilization, regardless of how seemingly insignificant/ significant, or actual influence with power to shift anything for better, or for worse, directly, matters at all levels.

    Remember, it’s a collective, not an individual, not one person. Even when the mastery is of one person, their ability to impact is not exclusive.

    Even in a take of a “God-like” ability, it’d be at most to destroy it all; to influence each of those who actually allow, and what they do with that “influence”, perspective.

    Faith, regardless of what, or choice not to, doesn’t matter.

    The idea is the understanding of impact, beyond ignorance of trying to redefine anything, for the sake of living in the illusion of delusions – alphabetical, meaning, understanding skewing is damaging to those who invite it in, and what/ who they are allowed to spread such over to, nothing else.

    Not knowing is one thing, willingly damaging one’s understanding, and or confusing what misinformed is, and updating such, is also another.

    Balance.

    It is not some pursue of profound genius, rather of understanding the evolved science of being homosapien, over other species. The thinking man.

    This is where leadership is supposed to reflect a higher intellectual person, not an image of one, not the “collective attractiveness” of the illusion of.

    It’s not aggressiveness or the opposite, it’s not being cunning over the other extreme, and so on; it really is the balance of all aspects, to each situation accordingly, logically, in actual application; denying situations of extreme, or inflating comforts is not the point.

    Not common, not a celebrity, or other everyday traits determined; ironically, those in such positions where curated images depend on, will imitate/ plagiarize those traits/ individuals with, but not recognize them in true direct acknowledgement often.

    Any two basis of thinking simply can comprehend the equation of it all; it isn’t approval of unconstructive behaviour, of course.

    If damaging traits, and fallacies are favored upon society and or civilization, the outcomes inevitably reflect the same, amplified; regardless of the admittance of, not, reality isn’t something that can be curated into a momentary image, obviously.

    In the sense of what is covered on the reality of society at present, diplomacy, and facade are not the same thing, by a long shot.

    I live in North America, for example. Very different culturally and ergo the dynamics of what might work and not, not just locally, but in the sense of the international relationships of all aspects in society and civilization.

    Excuses run in unlimited supply, and they are not equivalent of explanations for understanding, particularly where situations demand them, especially in the scale of public and similar leadership.

    In Canada where I live, and the United States, the closest neighbouring country, a lot of situations have impacted social, and civil dynamics the last decade or so.

    Taking promising growth and advancement into less than desirable scenarios.

    The image of age, political affiliations, even personal choices such as gender, faith, or other traits like geolocation, etc, have been used to attempt to swindle politically and in like circles, while using these things, commonly affiliated with “better leadership”, as narratives for useless and actually failing leadership, endorsement.

    Learning to discern from shock factors, and factual issues that are impactful and matter, is necessary to not fail oneself and what indicates one’s participation in the collective of civilization/ society.

    Diplomacy and collusion differ greatly; like ignoring and moving on.

    On the note of living in North America, the contrasting image of what were prior politics from the same political branch in Canada, for example, it’s significant.

    Besides being the same branch, the public image of ethical and caring being factors at hand, however in application of actual leadership capability differing significantly, are easily observable traits between characters.

    It is still early for Mr. Carney to be fully compared to Mr. Trudeau, and or other leaders previously, or aspiring to, from other political branches, but the strength of professionalism, direct approach and addressing of situations affecting Canada locally and internationally, are hands down not comparable to the current leaders from other branches aspiring to become; personally, I do not see such qualities in any of the leaders in other political parties currently, and such to be true to the matter, do not happen overnight.

    The use of gaslighting and or deflection tactics usually observed across other leadership, even beyond local, are definitely not factors of reliance into Mr. Carney’s style of politics, which is one true trait of an actual capable leader, especially in the level of the position held.

    Likewise in the neighbouring United States, and even other leadership locally, such as provincial, it leaves a lot to wish for, when looking at individuals like Douglas Ford, and Donald Trump.

    Even if wanting to ignore their grotesque style of gaslighting the public, and peddling perturbing takes, they have done severe economic and social damage since sitting in office at each of their respective levels, and places.

    Promoting individuals like Elon Musk whom have been significantly toxic in society and civilization advancement, regardless of the curated media images, and changing narratives out of investigative convenience, further show why such people are not beneficial in leadership positions.

    Not limited to, but a long list that seems endless of the negative impact such individuals, even accounting the length of time of opportunity they have had, adds more to the point.

    Size of office, are not limitations; in like contrast, Mr. Newsom, leader of the state of California, is a good candidate in this same example, that shows the difference made, when truly wanting to lead with intellect, not ignorant rhetoric, seeking self gain/ benefit.

    If left to be, damaging choices expand to the spaces they are in, as much as if properly supported and acknowledged, big or small, admirable minds become positive assets, beyond themselves and lives because of one’s own personal selections.

    There is no such a thing as diluting greatness and getting out of the ordinary outcomes; you get how and what you invest on, in equal, not in beliefs of what that is or means, that’s for sure.

    โˆ…ADONAIโˆ…โ˜€๏ธ

    11.02.2025 15:00

  • Politics Religion As Brands

    A take on my views of politics, branches of, religion, faith, anti establishment, philosophies and correlated social dynamics.

    As it is obvious on article and beyond, I have no political group affiliations, pro or anti anything; that also extends beyond politics and otherwise, of course in the same fundamentals of the undeniably obvious.

    To anyone in the world, regardless of who they are in any and all senses of the meaning of, it is not hard to understand the logic as to why.

    Besides the grossness of specific individuals in time, long ago and not so far, across politics and other like leadership, there is of course the corrosiveness of what I can only label as “wannabe” anti establishment movements, in cheap imitation, even mockery seen in their affiliations and incentivizers/ incentives, and obviously damaging also to actual people in higher ideologies of such concepts like anonymous movements.

    Movements of those that very much do not exist today, and nothing more left other than coward assaulters, backed by quite literally proven over and over irrefutably, activities like “live watching devices” and the likes of, besides obviously obsessive and perturbed with everything observed/ heard and collected, in disturbing takes of luck, occultism, synchronicity, law of attraction, psychological programming (“gaslighting”, and/ or pretend someone’s words and or actions are something else, or mocking them in awareness of private personal details, because of data collected and/or predicted/ awareness is because of – the goal is to rationalize abuses, get funded/ continue to, and/ or incentivize explosive actions like suicide, social large/ small harm, and/or silencing targeted individuals from speaking about sensitive matters from big and small, including articles, social media, other, going to police over rape, domestic abuse, other – psychological torture and coercion en gang styled), etc.

    All of these things showing well their “ideologies”, ironically, besides being selected if not joining themselves because of their lack of values, and envy/ damaging mentality and traits, from gossip to assault, harm, etc.

    I couldn’t dislike more than I do groups like Qanon, Truckers Convoy, YAC Anon, Antifa and several like other, formerly all under very much what is known as: “M.A.G.A” (make america great again), for obvious reasons, and beyond borders, assumptions, and presumptions by all worldwide. Whatever other nonsense they come up with later, “liberal”, “conservative”, “communist”, “anti this/ that/ establishment”, whatever else, same trash.

    You see it in Canada, & other places, crypto currency networks, damaging views of stock market traits, businesses big/ small, startups, non profits, even public discourse with alphabet, numbers, colors, symbols, delusions of alternative communications, psychological programming/ reminding/ control, etc, and even open statements like “alternative facts”, etc, coined by the exact same.

    One local example of such “jokes” are on the illogical takes of someone like Douglas Ford, hat and all, and Musk backer at the same time of Musk sitting AGAIN in Trump administration (November 2024; remember what other harassment, assault, home, house, etc, including those of my life, and others like green belt selling statements by Douglas Ford 2018 after Musk’s aid coup got him elected, and damaging area for overpriced & subpart quality houses. Twin soul themes and home references 2014/15 by me, lies of environment by Tesla, Musk and affiliated cult, & all other data matched in disgusting rapist actions and logic of same with energy luck, sexual assault, like politicians caught masturbating outside pre-schools 2022 – 24, Andrew Tate, Jeffrey Epstein affiliations in full awareness of rape and human/ child trafficking networks, etc), before changing theatrics due to the exposรฉ of my evidence, in spite of their influence, like all other.

    Coup whoever, “fake news” claims by wives/ gfs playing “libertarian ideologies” in pornographic takes (lesbians S.E.C., horses and handjobs, etc), foreign funders in securing such (likely all of the above, not just the coups), etc, shows what the reality of all in all aspects is.

    Worthlessness piled up individuals headed for self destruction.

    Anyone can see lines like “I’m sorry”, “I didn’t know better” are casually thrown around.

    Why lead then? Why make a movement of error and maintain it?

    Leadership of actual value isn’t in everyone, obviously. Wallets, gender, race, age, etc, even awards and titles / papers of, have become meaningless in a civilization favouring corruption, undeniably.

    As per “anonymous movements”, even if branching out or created “independently”, the fundamentals, mentality and all else remains the same.

    A “fandom” of gross ideologies spread out in alternative takes as masks, believing it distracts from the reality, abusers in a group.

    In the sense of politics like religion and correlated, all is a word blanketing an idea, and ergo ideologies; more or less, the foundations of a pro, or anti group.

    Even unintentionally, particularly politically speaking, promises cannot always be delivered.

    Movie by George Clooney, and Ryan Gosling, titled: “The Ides Of March” from year 2011, offers a great example of this.

    From hurt built on experienced, to limitations, and lack of actual care, beyond empty letters and presumptions of words, the reality is, change is the main thing in life.

    Leadership is an important structure of civilization and society.

    The mistakes (aware or not) of today, in this particular sense of course, reflect in the future, inevitably; the inability to take stances to a higher level of standards, along it.

    Emotions are separate of reason; values and empathy the systemic aspects of an advancing civilization, and society.

    Lack of mental accumen destructive and the demise of, reflected in the inability to tell things apart, or the actual meaning of concepts like that of, balance.//

    For full article: “Politics, Religion As Brands

    โˆ…ADONAIโˆ…

    10.14.2025 13:00